DC's bowling woes: A rigid spin template and Indian seamers' struggles


All the build-up around the Rajasthan Royals versus Delhi Capitals clash in Jaipur on Friday (May 1) revolved around how Vaibhav Sooryavanshi would fare against Mitchell Starc. A play within a play, this was looked at as one of the decisive factors in a crucial mid-table tussle, for RR openers had contributed 43.6% of the team runs across their first nine games in the tournament.
Yashasvi Jaiswal started the innings with a six for a record fourth time in the IPL, but fell to Starc two balls later. Sooryavanshi drilled his first ball for a four down the ground as Kyle Jamieson missed his length by a fraction, before redeeming himself with a perfect yorker to castle the youngster. Within two overs, DC had got rid of the two RR lynchpins.
And yet, they ended up conceding 225/6 - the third time in four outings they conceded as many or more. Their openers helped them gun down the target without much fuss, continuing the tournament's run-chase tradition. Their recurring bowling struggles however, could leave them behind in the race to the playoffs.
Over-reliance on spin twins - a rigid template
Heading into the contest, DC bowlers had collectively bagged six wickets in the Powerplay at an average of 85.83 and a strike-rate of 48 - the worst on all three parameters among the 10 teams. They got a headstart on Friday, but the structure of their bowling attack - in stark contrast to what is suited to the venue, and has been the trend in the tournament overall - allowed the hosts to crawl their way back.
Across IPL 2025 and 2026, spinners have accounted for 45.8% of the overs bowled by DC, a number only exceeded by KKR (46.9%). The corresponding numbers for the two teams in IPL 2026 are 40.2% and 45.4% respectively, well clear of the next best 34% and overall tournament aggregate of 31.8%. With Axar Patel and Kuldeep Yadav being regulars, DC have used Vipraj Nigam and the part-time spin of Nitish Rana among others, while relying on three seamers. The two Indian spinners have been far from their best in the competition, but it's worth noting that with scoring on the rise overall, the role and overall impact of the spinners has somewhat diminished.
Seamers take up each of the top-seven spots in the Purple Cap race after the first 43 matches. Spinners have accounted for just 32% of the overs bowled in IPL 2026, the third-least across the 19 editions of the tournament.
Percentage of overs split for pace and spin in the IPL (by editions)
| Year | Pace% | Spin% |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 76.6 | 23.4 |
| 2013 | 71 | 29 |
| 2026 | 68 | 32 |
| 2024 | 66.5 | 33.5 |
| 2015 | 66.4 | 33.6 |
| 2022 | 64.9 | 35.1 |
| 2012 | 64.7 | 35.3 |
| 2021 | 64.4 | 35.6 |
| 2017 | 64.1 | 35.9 |
| 2016 | 64 | 36 |
| 2011 | 62.3 | 37.7 |
| 2010 | 62.1 | 37.9 |
| 2025 | 61.7 | 38.3 |
| 2020 | 61.7 | 38.3 |
| 2009 | 61 | 39 |
| 2014 | 60.2 | 39.8 |
| 2018 | 60.2 | 39.8 |
| 2023 | 58.1 | 41.9 |
| 2019 | 58 | 42 |
DC managed to limit RR to 56/2 by the end of the Powerplay on Friday, but went at 10.11 (91/1) in Overs 7-15. They have conceded at 10.01 in this phase in the tournament so far, a number only exceeded by MI (10.32), who currently occupy the ninth spot in the points table. Overall, they have gone at 10.17 outside of the Powerplay, third-worst among all teams. Kuldeep Yadav, who has delivered all his overs with a spread out field, has gone at 10.25.
The scorecard would possibly suggest that Kuldeep and Axar were their two best bowlers on the day, but the ill-timed last over of spin allowed RR a late flourish. Kuldeep came in to bowl the 18th over of the innings, and Donovan Ferreira hit him for three sixes to round-off a 20 run-over. It might've been a case of a matchup, as Kuldeep had dismissed Ferreira twice in nine balls in T20s before Friday. But it backfired, as was the case with them using Nitish Rana against Abhishek Sharma earlier in the tournament. DC bowled eight overs of spin on Friday, RR bowled nine in their two games combined in Jaipur.
Shivang Kumar conceded 31 off his two overs here last week, and those remained the only two overs of spin bowled by SRH. They had Nitish Kumar Reddy to fill in, and Pat Cummins and others collectively combined to limit the damage in the final five. KKR's spin-heavy template served them well in 2024, for they had Andre Russell to fill in the sixth bowler's role when needed, and he finished as the joint fourth-highest wicket-taker that season.
As it stands, spinners have conceded 3/225 in 19 overs (ER: 11.84) in Jaipur in two games, the worst on every parameter among the 11 venues in IPL 2026. DC's own home venue, one with the shortest of boundary dimensions, doesn't make it any easier for the spinners either, as they discovered during PBKS' record chase last week.
A misfiring Indian pace-bowling contingent
Starc's return is a much needed boost for DC after Lungi Ngidi's unfortunate concussion, but even if the two feature together later in the tournament, the returns from the Indian bowling contingent leaves much to be desired. They went big on Mukesh Kumar (INR 8 CR) and T Natarajan (INR 10.75 CR) in the mega auctions, and acquired Auqib Nabi for INR 8.40 later, but none has been able to produce a performance of note. Natarajan has gone at 12.54 across his last six spells, conceding over 50 in three of them, while the other two have been snubbed from the starting XI.
DC seamers in IPL 2026
| Nationality | Wickers | Ave | SR | Econ | Dot% | Bnd% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indian | 10 | 68.6 | 36.8 | 11.18 | 27.7 | 26.35 |
| Overseas | 12 | 29.5 | 18.3 | 9.65 | 34 | 23.63 |
Across their runners-up finish in 2020 and in 2021 wherein they topped the league standings, DC seamers bagged 193 wickets at a strike-rate of 20.1, well clear of the next best Mumbai Indians (171, SR: 20.4). Kagiso Rabada and Anrich Nortje bagged 79 wickets between them in those two years, but they released Rabada thereafter, going big after Shardul Thakur (INR 10.75 CR), Khaleel Ahmed (INR 5.25 CR) and Chetan Sakariya (INR 4.2 CR) in the following mega-auction. It didn't materialize, even with the experience of Mohit Sharma and Ishant Sharma thereafter, as the numbers reflect below. They have been the worst on every parameter since.
Team-wise bowling stats for Indian seamers in the IPL since 2022
| Team | Wkts | Ave | Econ | SR | Bnd% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GT | 221 | 25.62 | 9.1 | 16.8 | 22.05 |
| RCB | 168 | 29.82 | 9.22 | 19.3 | 21.24 |
| MI | 166 | 27.56 | 9.26 | 17.8 | 21.28 |
| CSK | 143 | 29.37 | 9.34 | 18.8 | 23.1 |
| PBKS | 128 | 30.8 | 9.45 | 19.5 | 22.19 |
| LSG | 161 | 30 | 9.51 | 18.9 | 23.01 |
| RR | 128 | 32.07 | 9.57 | 20 | 22.05 |
| SRH | 189 | 31.69 | 9.59 | 19.8 | 22.47 |
| KKR | 123 | 30.07 | 9.59 | 18.7 | 23.48 |
| DC | 140 | 33.15 | 9.94 | 20 | 23.92 |
Even DC's record chase hasn't been enough to narrow the gulf between them and the top four. In bid to bolster their seam attack with two overseas quicks, they left out David Miller, whose last-over heroics helped them seal one of their four wins, after having narrowly missed out against GT earlier. Often a measure of how teams fare in a long tournament, DC have used 20 players in IPL 2026 so far, only second to MI's 22. With five games left in the league stage, they have little room to chop and change further. Another dismal outing with the ball however, might still prompt for more.





